So, I was thinking about my reviews that I have done on here so far, and feel that they have been very varied in their style and approach. Especially the games. If anyone has been on Neoseeker and read my reviews on there, you’ll know what I’m talking about. This is for game reviews only, however, and when I do other reviews, I will outline how I will go about them first.
From now on, I’ll be doing a free flow approach, starting with what I feel is the main point of discussion. From there, I will cover a lot of other things as well that are needed for that game. This will be varied, depending on how much time is needed to cover it. Once that is over, I will then list ten pointers, both good and bad, which will form the basis of the entire review. There will be no score, although the good pointers of the review will sort of form the basics of that score. Eight good points will be eight out of ten, for example.
Since I want to start doing more review based articles, I felt it would be a good idea to set out some guidelines of how I will be doing them. For myself as much as those coming to this site. And since the guidelines are better seen through example, there’s a review coming very soon which will show exactly how these guidelines will be followed.
[NOTE: These guidelines were never really followed, but for archival sake, this article has been reuploaded to this new site.]
